Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:36
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ossett prostate cancer patient urges men to have checks - BBC
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Cryptocurrency Platform Gemini Confidentially Files for IPO - PYMNTS.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Tomato Recall Escalates to Highest Health Risk Alert—Here’s What You Need to Know - Real Simple
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Don't you think Israel is and always has been the biggest obstacle to peace in the Middle East?
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
A recipe to reverse cancer’s sweet tooth - Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Have you experimented with bestiality?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
'Materialists': Celine Song on Dating and Sex and the City's Influence - IndieWire